A systematic review of 30 years of research reveals where Islamic educational leadership is thriving, where it is ignored, and what needs to change.
In the year 1990, if you had searched academic databases for research on “Islamic educational leadership,” you would have found almost nothing. For the next thirteen years, the silence continued. Then, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent rise of Islamophobia and Muslim immigration to Western nations, scholars finally began to pay attention.
A systematic review has mapped the entire landscape of peer-reviewed research on Islamic-based educational leadership from 1990 to 2021. The findings, led by researchers Khalid Arar, Rania Sawalhi, and Mustafa Yılmaz from Texas State University and Qatar University, offer both encouragement and urgent warnings.
The review analyzed 36 studies drawn from an initial pool of 1,070 articles, following the rigorous PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The results paint a picture of a field that is young, growing, geographically uneven, and methodologically narrow — yet full of potential to improve education for millions of Muslim students worldwide.
A Field Born from Crisis
The first study included in the review was published in 2003. For the next decade, research trickled out slowly. But from 2015 onward, the number of publications increased dramatically. The authors link this growth directly to global events.
“Many researchers showed that there has been a proliferation in studies related to Islamic education since 9/11 due to heightened interest and global problematizing of both Islam in general and Muslims’ status in the West,” the review states.
Political unrest in the Middle East, North Africa, and other parts of the Global South has also driven Muslim immigration to Europe, North America, and Australia. As Muslim communities established schools for their children, researchers began asking: Who leads these schools? What values guide them? How do they balance religious identity with integration into secular societies?
Where Is the Research Happening? A Surprising Map
If you assumed that most research on Islamic school leadership would come from Muslim-majority countries, you would be wrong. The review found that the majority of studies were conducted in non-Muslim countries, primarily in the Global North: the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Finland, and Sweden.
Geographic Origins of Islamic Educational Leadership Research (1990–2021)
| Region/Country Type | Examples | Percentage of Studies |
|---|---|---|
| Western/Non-Muslim majority | USA, UK, Australia, Netherlands, Finland, Sweden | ~60% |
| Asian Muslim-majority | Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey | ~35% |
| Arab Muslim-majority | None represented | <1% |
| Cross-cultural/Comparative | Very rare | Minimal |
Interestingly, no Arab Muslim-majority countries produced studies that met the inclusion criteria. The authors note that this absence may reflect either a lack of research infrastructure or political constraints on publishing critical findings in autocratic regimes.
Among Muslim-majority nations, Indonesia and Malaysia lead the way, consistent with their broader productivity in educational leadership research. Turkey also appears, but no studies from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, or the Gulf states made the final cut.
Three Major Themes: Policy, Leadership, and Gender
When the researchers analyzed the content of the 36 studies, three dominant themes emerged.
Theme 1: Policy, Reforms, and Stakeholders (10 papers)
These studies examined how national governments shape Islamic schooling through curriculum mandates, inspection systems, and principal appointment policies. In Western countries, the pressure is often toward integration. For example, research on Islamic schools in the Netherlands showed how government inspections push schools to demonstrate both academic quality and active citizenship education.
In Thailand, researchers studied how principals in the southern border provinces implemented national reforms while navigating violent conflict and community distrust. In Bangladesh and South Asia, scholars analyzed madrasa reforms attempting to introduce modern subjects alongside religious instruction.
A key finding across policy studies: Islamic schools in the West face constant external pressure to prove they are not “breeding grounds for terrorism.” This defensive posture shapes everything from curriculum to leadership decisions.
Theme 2: Educational Leadership Models and Styles (26 papers)
This was the largest category. Researchers identified several leadership models practiced in Islamic schools:
- Faith-based leadership (charismatic and spiritual): Leaders are seen as role models who embody Qur’anic values. One Indonesian study examined Kiai leadership — religious figures who lead traditional Islamic boarding schools (pesantren). Another study measured how spiritual leadership fosters organizational citizenship behavior and self-esteem among teachers.
- Community-engaged leadership (culturally relevant and democratic): In the United States, researchers documented how principals lead for “critical consciousness,” helping Muslim students develop pride in both their faith and their American identity. These leaders facilitate interfaith dialogue and challenge both Islamophobia and extremist narratives.
- Strategic leadership: Less common, but some studies examined how principals navigate the competing demands of religious authenticity, academic excellence, and political survival.
The review notes a serious conceptual weakness: Most studies borrow Western leadership theories (transformational, distributed, authentic) and simply add an “Islamic” label. Very few ground their frameworks in classical Islamic sources like the Qur’an, Hadith, or the works of medieval Muslim scholars such as Al-Kaylani (1981, 1985).
Theme 3: Gender, Feminism, and Social Justice (4 papers)
A small but powerful set of studies focused on Muslim women principals. One study examined how Arab Muslim women in Israel navigate the hijab and principalship, arguing for a “third wave” of Islamic feminism. Another US-based study proposed “Islamic feminist school leadership” — three practices: leading by modeling equity and justice, nurturing communal culture, and leading for transformational resistance.
These women leaders face double challenges: sexism within their own communities and Islamophobia in the wider society. Yet the research shows they are not passive victims. They actively craft leadership identities that honor their faith while fighting for justice.
“We contend that Islam and feminism cannot be combined without clear definitions,” the authors caution. Nevertheless, the emergence of this theme signals a growing recognition that gender justice is central to any authentic Islamic educational project.
The Methods Problem: Too Many Interviews, Not Enough Numbers
The review delivers a sobering methodological critique. Of the 29 empirical studies:
- 28 used qualitative methods (interviews, case studies, document analysis)
- Only 2 used purely quantitative methods
- 6 used mixed methods
Research Methods in Islamic Educational Leadership Studies
| Method Type | Number of Studies | What This Means |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative (interviews, case studies) | 28 | Rich stories, but hard to generalize |
| Quantitative (surveys, statistics) | 2 | Rare — little data on “what works” |
| Mixed methods | 6 | Combining stories with numbers — still uncommon |
| Conceptual/theoretical | 7 | Ideas without empirical testing |
The over-reliance on small-scale case studies means the field lacks generalizable knowledge. We cannot say, for example, whether spiritual leadership actually improves student test scores or reduces dropout rates. We do not know which leadership practices are most effective in different contexts (e.g., Western vs. Muslim-majority countries).
The authors call urgently for more quantitative and comparative research. They also note that almost all studies rely on principal and teacher self-reports. Student voices are nearly absent.
Introducing “Islamic-Based Education”: A New Term for a Fuzzy Field
One of the most valuable contributions of the review is its proposal of a new term: Islamic-based education. The authors argue that the existing terms — “Islamic education,” “Muslim schooling” — are used so inconsistently that they have lost meaning.
“Any study attempting to suggest an educational theory/framework should not be labeled as ‘Islamic’ unless all Muslim scholars agree on it,” they write. Since such consensus does not exist, “Islamic-based education” serves as an umbrella term for all educational opportunities that draw on Islamic principles, for both Muslim and non-Muslim learners.
This may sound like academic hair-splitting, but it has practical consequences. Without clear definitions, parents cannot compare schools, policymakers cannot design coherent regulations, and researchers cannot build cumulative knowledge.
What Is Missing? The Afterlife and Classical Scholars
The review identifies two striking absences in the literature.
First, the afterlife. Islam teaches that life on earth is preparation for the eternal afterlife. Yet none of the reviewed studies link educational leadership to spiritual preparation for the hereafter. Leadership is discussed in purely worldly terms: test scores, integration, career readiness. The transcendent purpose of Islamic education — knowing and loving Allah — is almost entirely absent.
Second, classical Islamic scholarship. Before Western educational theory existed, Muslim scholars like Al-Kaylani, Ibn Taymiya, and Al-Ghazali wrote extensively about teaching, learning, and leadership. The current research largely ignores this heritage. Instead, it applies Western frameworks (transformational leadership, social justice leadership) to Muslim contexts.
The authors argue that future research must “reconnect to the Quran and Hadith in forming educational leaders and designing educational leadership frameworks through an Islamic lens.”
Practical Takeaways for Parents, Educators, and Policymakers
For parents considering Islamic schools:
- Ask not just about test scores, but about leadership values. Does the principal model honesty, consultation (shura), and reflection (tafakkur)?
- Look for schools that actively build both Islamic identity AND citizenship in the wider society. The best Islamic schools reject both extremism and assimilation.
For principals and teachers:
- Spiritual leadership is not just a “soft skill.” Research shows it increases teachers’ organizational commitment and discretionary effort. Lead from your values.
- Develop culturally relevant pedagogy. Help Muslim students critically engage with both their faith and the dominant culture.
For policymakers:
- Stop defensive inspections that assume Islamic schools are terrorist threats. Instead, partner with Muslim educators to develop quality indicators that respect religious values.
- Fund rigorous quantitative research on Islamic school outcomes. We cannot manage what we do not measure.
For researchers:
- Clarify your positionality. Are you Muslim? Which interpretive tradition do you follow (Sunni, Shi’a, Sufi)? This matters.
- Use mixed methods. Combine surveys with interviews. Compare Islamic schools across countries.
- Include student voices. How do young Muslims experience leadership in their schools?
A Hopeful but Incomplete Picture
The last three decades have seen the birth and growth of a new academic field. Islamic-based educational leadership research now exists across multiple continents. Scholars have documented inspiring examples of Muslim principals fighting for justice, building community, and nurturing faithful, confident young people.
But the field remains immature. It is too Western-centric, too qualitative, too disconnected from classical Islamic knowledge, and too silent on the ultimate purposes of education. The authors of this systematic review have given us a clear map of where we are. Now the work begins to reach where we need to go.
As the review concludes: “We urge researchers and practitioners to consider this study as a point of departure and not a destination.”
For the millions of Muslim children in Islamic schools around the world — from Jakarta to Detroit, from London to Kuala Lumpur — they deserve nothing less.
Reference: here
Other Articles:
